| To: | Mike Keefe <mkeefe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Suggested memory size |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 May 2002 11:36:49 -0500 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3CD16A69.B166CACC@ucentric.com> |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.33L2.0205021804360.10381-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <1020355730.652.1.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3CD16A69.B166CACC@ucentric.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 11:33, Mike Keefe wrote: > > What if you were using direct i/o (O_DIRECT) to stream data from a 16M > system ? Would that still be as much of an issue - would the same > performance > considerations still hold ? > > Thanks, > Mike Keefe O_DIRECT would be better, memory size should not be the issue then, more can device A and the CPU keep up with device B. I would recommend trying it out on a regular box with this amount of memory (use the boot options to trim it down) and a similar bandwidth for data input and output before you invest a lot of effort into the embedded setup. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Suggested memory size, Mike Keefe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Snapshots, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Suggested memory size, Mike Keefe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Suggested memory size, Michael Sinz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |