xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Free space question

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Free space question
From: bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:12:29 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1020279885.28901.71.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.33L2.0205011859110.24740-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <1020273839.3cd024af9c1aa@webmail.midco.net> <1020275216.1266.17.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1020277416.3cd032a880faf@webmail.midco.net> <1020277619.1202.21.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1020278255.28928.63.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <1020279058.3cd0391210692@webmail.midco.net> <1020279323.28928.67.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <1020279724.3cd03bac1cece@webmail.midco.net> <1020279885.28901.71.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0
Ooops...a little quick on the send. I meant to say that xfs_check reports 
nothing.

Quoting Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>:

> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 14:02, bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > xfs_repair reports nothing. What if I were to dump the fs, rebuild the
> > partition, and restore the dump? I've tried about everything else..
> 
> Please try xfs_check on it - it is a different program, it does not
> fix things, but it does a good consistency check using a different
> algorithm. The freesp output suggests there is corruption, we at least
> need to capture that before doing anything else.
> 
> Steve
> 
> .
> > 
> > Quoting Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>:
> > 
> > 
> > > Ugh, try xfs_check on the unmounted device, it will look at different
> > > things. Those numbers look way out of bounds.
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
> > > Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> 
> Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
> Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx
> 
> 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>