xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: performance patches

To: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: performance patches
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Apr 2002 09:30:21 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Mikes work account <mrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3CC95F9A.91A4F784@up.ac.za>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204260900070.26820-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> <3CC95F9A.91A4F784@up.ac.za>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 09:09, Paul Schutte wrote:
> Is there a good reason for having the logsize=1200b by default ?
> 
> I have found that it almost alway causes slowdown under heavy I/O.
> 
> Can't we make it 8192b (32Mb) by default.
> 27968 kb is not much to sacrifice.
> It will help people that have no experience with XFS to go fast out of the 
> box.
> 
> Paul
> 

If you are putting xfs on a disk and not using it for I/O intensive
operations, then a smaller log is all you need. There is a cost
associated with a larger log - longer mount times even when the
filesystem was cleanly unmounted.

The default size does grow with larger filesystems, but I think they
need to be pretty big before that kicks in. The sizing is more an Irix
thing than a linux one - I think it does not kick in until 1 Tbyte.

Steve

-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>