Has anything else been changed in CVS? I'm hoping that nothing is
broken because I'm planning on putting the machine into production this
weekend.
Chris
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 17:40, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Chris Tooley wrote:
> > I did make the switch in configure from -lacl -lattr and faired no
> > better results. I'm using XFS version 1.1 from the 2.4.9-31SGI_XFSsmp
> > kernel.
> >
> > checking if large file support can be enabled... yes
> > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in
> > -lattr... no
> > checking for ACL support... no
>
> Your configure changes are incorrect - they're looking in the wrong
> library for acl_get_file (which is in libacl, not libattr), as I
> said earlier you need to link with both libraries.
>
> It has been pointed out that we can do a better job when building
> libacl so that it knows it depends on libattr (in fact this was
> done at one point, but was accidentally dropped from the Makefile).
> If you build and install the acl code from XFS CVS (have a look
> though cmd/acl/doc/INSTALL), you should find that Samba gets
> built correctly with no changes at all now.
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
|