| To: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing |
| From: | Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 Mar 2002 14:44:26 +0000 |
| Cc: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1017235934.29730.6.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203262227050.17959-100000@chuckle.americas.sgi.com> <3CA179E7.7413F25@ch.sauter-bc.com> <1017235934.29730.6.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 13:32, Florin Andrei wrote: > > And the answer is quite simple: you guys are all using XFS, right? I > guess most of you know that it works just perfect on busy servers, under > high system load. > Well, go to lkml (Linux Kernel Mailing List), send a nice message > explaining how stable is XFS in production, and asking for inclusion. > If a reasonable amount of people will do that on the list, it's bound to > get included. > > It's not just Red Hat, it's Linux. ;-) Another thing to do is get XFS moved from 'Beta' to 'Ready' status on: http://kernelnewbies.org/status/ I guess all that would take is an email from someone at SGI. <- Hint Thanks -tony |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS pressure group, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | ACLs (was Re: XFS pressure group), Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |