| To: | Derek J Witt <cappicard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Mar 2002 11:00:34 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203241059060.5366-100000@saiya-jin.flinthills.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203241059060.5366-100000@saiya-jin.flinthills.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 11:04, Derek J Witt wrote: > Hi! I'm using the 2.4.18-xfs cvs tree. I just used RML's 2.4.18-1 patch > and it works like a charm. I applied that patch after applying Shawn > Starr's patch10 and i'm having no problems here. I've heard reports that although the preempt patches apply and build and run, you're not actually getting any benefit w/ xfs kernels - but I have not looked into this. > One problem I encountered is that if I jump my FSB speed to 75MHz and PCI > to 37MHz, I get kernel panics the first time around once the drives get > mounted. try alt.overclocking.breaks.stuff :) > I got a quick question about reading XFS partitions in Windows 2000. Is > there such a creature to allow me to do just that? No, no such option. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?, Paul Blazejowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?), Chris Tooley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?), Derek J Witt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.18-xfs and RML's kernel-preempt (was: XFS latest changes, sb corruption?), Chris Tooley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |