| To: | jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best? |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 18 Mar 2002 17:11:58 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15510.28824.127449.355731@jdc.local> |
| References: | <15510.28824.127449.355731@jdc.local> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ahh..yes...openAFS. I should've thought about that one. Then you could user kerberos too! :) On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 16:56, Jason White wrote: > pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > > > Anyone use or care about: > > > > a. Coda > > b. Intermezzo > > Why not consider > c. OpenAFS (http://www.openafs.org/) which I have never used, but > apparently it works (or at least used to work/has been rumored to > work) with XFS as the underlying file system on the AFS partitions. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oops on 2.4.17, some fs corruption., Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, Jason White |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Distributed File Systems. Which is best?, pac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |