Re: NFS and XFS again.

To:	"Zhifeng F. Chen" <zffchen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: NFS and XFS again.
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date:	30 Jan 2002 16:14:23 -0600
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<011101c1a9cc$53acf170$906a7080@divine>
References:	<011101c1a9cc$53acf170$906a7080@divine>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

What exactly are you doing?  (linking what to what?)

ENAMETOOLONG can arise when namelen >= MAXNAMELEN, which is #defined as
256...

Can you show me the steps to duplicate the problem here?

-Eric

On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 14:25, Zhifeng F. Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've met a problem with NFS and XFS combo. When I make a symbolic link on 
> /home/user/.../..., sometimes I met "File name too long" error. What's wrong 
> with it?

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
NFS and XFS again., Zhifeng F. Chen Re: NFS and XFS again., Eric Sandeen <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Oops in bdflush with 2.4.1[4\|7]-xfs, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:	Re: Oops in bdflush with 2.4.1[4\|7]-xfs, Nathan Poznick
Previous by Thread:	NFS and XFS again., Zhifeng F. Chen
Next by Thread:	Oops in bdflush with 2.4.1[4\|7]-xfs, Nathan Poznick
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]