Ahh...that's not good, but yes, it is from the same feature.
On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 20:50, pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:56:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Is there any legitimate reason you would want to do this? I dont
> > > want to scream at them if there is a good reason for it. What is the
> > > opinion of the FS developers here?
> >
> > It's for example useful for chroot. You can mount a single file system
> > in multiple chroots. There is also the related feature of mount
> --bind
> > which allows to do the same thing for directories and files. Again
> > it is useful for chroots.
>
> Yes, but in my case, i had 2 filesystems mounted on the SAMe mount
> point.
> Here is an inherent ambiguity in which filesystem i am actually
> write/reading
> from.
>
> -Phil Carinhas
> --
> .--------------------------------------------------------.
> | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas | pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com |
> | Linux Consulting & Training | Tel : 1-512-467-2154 |
> `--------------------------------------------------------'
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|