On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 09:28, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:24:25PM +0100, Matthijs van der Klip wrote:
> > Just to let you know: I just grabbed the xfs patches (20000 and up) from the
> > 2.4.9-12 SRPM and put them in the 2.4.9-21 source. I haven't tested it yet,
> > but
> > I have successfully built 2.4.9-21SGI_XFS_1.0.2 RPM's. So it seems very easy
> > indeed.
>
> If we're talking about making a new XFS/RH kernel RPM, can we also look at
> upgrading the LVM code from 1.0.1-rc4 to 1.0.1 or 1.0.2 (released today --
> 1/24/2002 ...)
>
> There've been a decent number of bug fixes that would be nice to get fixed. :)
I really think a new lvm needs a lot of soak time before we spin it
into a package. The 1.0.1 code has stack overflows with xfs, I have
no idea about the new code at all, I thought it was going to be a 2.0
release, or is that something different.
Steve
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> I'm serious about thinking through all the possibilities before we
> settle on anything. All things have the advantages of their
> disadvantages, and vice versa.
> -- Larry Wall in <199709032332.QAA21669@xxxxxxxx>
--
Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
|