| To: | Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Various anaconda installer fixes |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 23 Jan 2002 15:43:32 -0600 |
| Cc: | angus <boiteaflood@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C4F2C4D.7090206@ima.pl> |
| References: | <1011807822.12843.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1011808354.32690.2.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <3C4F2C4D.7090206@ima.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hm, I assume this is the same behavior as the standard Red Hat 7.2? I don't think anything we did should have changed this behavior... and unfortunately I don't think we have the bandwidth to fix problems not related to XFS.... -Eric On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 15:34, Blizbor wrote: > Hi, > > Eric, is it possible to correct one big mistake in the anaconda ? > During install process on i686 instaler chooses binaries compiled > fir i686 platform which makes such a instal unusable on Pentium MMX, > K6, Cyrix etc. -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Various anaconda installer fixes, Blizbor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel OOPS and several filed nullified, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Various anaconda installer fixes, Blizbor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Various anaconda installer fixes, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |