xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A little bit more on mount options

To: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A little bit more on mount options
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:08:06 +1000
In-reply-to: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@leathercollection.ph> "A little bit more on mount options" (Jul 16, 10:03am)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107160959310.381-100000@kalapati.leathercollection.local>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
hi,

On Jul 16, 10:03am, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> Subject: A little bit more on mount options
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have some minor questions as far as the tuning mount options are
> concerned.
> 
>  o nodiratime is not listed as one of the mount options in the mount
> manpage or in Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt. Does XFS know about this
> at all? Or does noatime do the job for files as well as directories?
> 

I'm not sure - Steve will know.

>  o quota, usrquota, and uqnoenforce are all listed in one "entry". Where
> can I get more information on working quotas and XFS? And are these flags
> equivalent to each other or do they do different things?
> 

quota == usrquota != uqnoenforce.  see README.quota in the
xfsprogs package.

>  o kio looks interesting, is it significant to issue this or does XFS
> automatically choose whether to use kiobufs or buffer heads depending on
> the current system configuration hence being auto-optimizing?

This mount option is no longer supported in XFS.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>