| To: | "Davida, Joe" <Joe_Davida@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs block size |
| From: | "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:30:39 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | "Davida, Joe" <Joe_Davida@Maxtor.com> "xfs block size" (Jan 12, 1:24pm) |
| References: | <09D1E9BD9C30D311919200A0C9DD5C2C025370A0@mcaexc01.msj.maxtor.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
hi Joe, On Jan 12, 1:24pm, Davida, Joe wrote: > Subject: xfs block size > Are there any plans to support 64K FS block > sizes? > How soon (ballpark date)? > In what version of Linux (2.4, 2.5...etc)? > Yes, there are plans - details are at: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/todos.html#_multiblocksize >From a conversation with Russell, he's predicted an eta of around 3 - 6 months from now (also saying that at the moment its not clear exactly what the solution will be and that there's plenty on his plate before getting onto this issue). We'd be looking at a 2.4.x+XFS tree I would imagine. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | REASSIGN 811747 - Report of XFS data corruption on hard system crash, nb@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - build, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs block size, Davida, Joe |
| Next by Thread: | RE: xfs block size, Davida, Joe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |