xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: full XFS system (XFS /boot & lilo)

To: Jason Walker <unseen@xxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: full XFS system (XFS /boot & lilo)
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:02:20 -0400
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Jason Walker <unseen@sover.net> "Re: full XFS system (XFS /boot & lilo)" (Jan 3, 12:58am)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101030052550.263-100000@surreal.localdomain>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
hi,

On Jan 3, 12:58am, Jason Walker wrote:
> Subject: Re: full XFS system (XFS /boot & lilo)
> > ...
> Indeed it does work with lilo and stuff. after seeing this
> e-mail, I decided to move my /boot to xfs and try it. I just
> did, and it works great.  I am using the 2.4pre kernel and I
> think...2.4test11 user-space tools...any reason I shouldn't
> move on up? I was worried if stuff bugged out, I wouldn't be
> able to move back to an earlier kernel, because the newer
> userspace tools would create compatibility issues. I ran into
> this with Reiser...any thoughts?
> 

the only recent tools compatability issue would be moving
from the beta tree (test5) to a development kernel (where
the XFS log format changed so as to be more IRIX-compatible).

moving from test11 to the prerelease kernel has no issues
(in fact the tools are pretty much exactly the same).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>