xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Dec 2001 18:13:36 -0600
Cc: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112261635360.6274-100000@thulcandra.chpc.utah.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112261635360.6274-100000@thulcandra.chpc.utah.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
I did it this way (XFS first) and I don't recall any problems.  If there
was a merge conflict, it was trivial to resolve.

-Eric

On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 17:36, drr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alp ATICI wrote:
> 
> > Which patch should we apply to the kernel first?

> My general rule is to apply bigger, more intrusive patches first, so I do
> XFS before preemption.
> 
> Dave
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, drr
Next by Date:  Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Sean Neakums
Previous by Thread:  Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, drr
Next by Thread:  Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS, Sean Neakums
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]