xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?

To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Q: Filesystem block sizes available?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Nov 2001 09:22:54 -0600
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tux mailing list <tux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131621390.1348-100000@mustard.heime.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111131621390.1348-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 09:23, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any particular incompatibility between TUX and XFS -
> > look at the Red Hat RPMS in the testing/ directory of the xfs ftp site,
> > those have both tux and xfs (although I have not tested tux in those
> > RPMS.)  If you don't want to use the RH kernels, perhaps they can give
> > you some hints on solving tux/xfs merge conflicts.
> 
> I can't use them. Ingo just released the -B1 version of Tux that solves a
> problem I had. And - yes - there _are_ incompatibility-problems between
> the two, althought I can't tell for sure what the problem is.

Well, if you have source from Ingo in the form of a patch, you could
merge it into the source rpm and rebuild. And we would need a little
more detail than there are 'incompatibility problems' to work out what
the problem might be there.

Steve

> 
> --
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
> 
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They stop working when you open Windows.
-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>