xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: About the -ac branch

To: Jordi Mallach <jordi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: About the -ac branch
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Oct 2001 16:18:52 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20011023231011.A14170@nubol.oskuro.net>
References: <20011023231011.A14170@nubol.oskuro.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Jordi - 

You might take a look at the recent kernels in the testing/ dir, if you
extract the patches from the SRPMS it might not be a bad place to start,
both of these are based on -ac kernels.

(note that the lvm code in the 2.4.9 kernel is broken, if that matters
to you).

-Eric

On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 16:10, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> First of all, thank you for the work you are doing on XFS for Linux.
> I've been using it for some time now and I'm very happy with it, no
> problems till the date.
> 
> Anyway, the problem. You know Linus and Alan's trees have diverged more
> and more lately, and many people are prefering Alan's tree now because
> of some decisions taken by Linus are a bit too much for a stable branch
> (like the sudden change of VM core). Anyway, I'm one of them, but
> currently I'm stuck with Linus because there's no patches for the -ac
> kernels.

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>