Re: alpha again

["Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 30,  8:56am, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> Subject: Re: alpha again
> ...
> i will wait with this - because due to russels post it seems to
> happen earlier and not really on umount

yup, that blew my theory out of the water.

> 
> just for my understanding: it will only be seen on umount
> because the trashed blocks will only then be written to disk
> and we are looking at the on disk layout with xfs_db only
> - right?
> 

Russells point was it isn't only seen on unmount though - thats
just when we happened to look previously - and we weren't doing
anything inbetween mount & umount which might force the agf out
earlier (we are now though).  yes, xfs_db only looks ondisk.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan