xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: question: xfs + lvm + kernel 2.4.9

To: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: question: xfs + lvm + kernel 2.4.9
From: Bartosch Pixa <bartosch.pixa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Sep 2001 18:19:40 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <yq11yl1re1q.fsf@jcb.mkp.net>
References: <3BAA08FB.3080204@microdiscovery.de> <yq11yl1re1q.fsf@jcb.mkp.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 19:02, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Bartosch" == Bartosch Pixa <dante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Bartosch> i'm trying to get a kernel 2.4.9 working with XFS and LVM
> Bartosch> 1.0.1-rc2, i got some errors after aplying the XFS patch
> Bartosch> (linux-2.4.9-xfs-2001-08-26.patch) to a already LVM patched
> Bartosch> kernel, the errors were only in the LVM parts of the kernel,
> Bartosch> so my question is now if it's sane to ignore these errors or
> Bartosch> if there are issues with XFS and LVM.
> 
> 1.0.1-rc3 should be out next week.  I would recommend you hold off
> until then.

thx for the info, i sure will, but still there is the question if there
are any problems with lvm and xfs (the rejecter files during the patch
for example)

thx for the help
 
-- 
Bartosch Pixa, bartosch.pixa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MicroDiscovery GmbH
Immanuelkirchstr. 12, D-10405 Berlin, Germany
Tel.: +49-(0)30-44350900, Fax: +49-(0)30-443509010


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>