Re: xfs on ppc status

["Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

hi Thomas,

On Aug 31,  3:45am, Steve Lord wrote:
> Subject: Re: xfs on ppc status
> > 
> > also now it would be really good to have a working non-sim
> > xfs_repair ...
> 
> Does the non-sim version build on the ppc? If it does then xfs_repair -n
> output would be a good thing to see.
> 

The output from xfs_check might provide some insight also.

I'm not sure that a "working non-sim xfs_repair" is going to
prove useful yet - the part which doesn't work currently is the
write path & since repair shares much of this code with the
kernel, anything broken in the kernel already is quite likely
to also be broken in repair.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan