xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Any better way to interact with xfs?

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Any better way to interact with xfs?
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:48:26 -0500
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <SYXPR01MB044863A851C967C37649BE3FF8000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <SYXPR01MB044863A851C967C37649BE3FF8000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
On 7/27/16 10:30 PM, Ryan Lindsay wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I have a bit of a specific requirement.
> 
> I have a server that currently has a 12T worth of data on it on an
> xfs formatted LV.
> 
> currently the file permissions are set via an LDAP, however we are
> having to move to AD for out authentication mechanism. Which will
> change the value of the existing UID's and GID's
> 
> Since XFS has a lot of mechanisms that allow things to happen in
> parallel. I was wondering if there was a way of interacting at the
> file system level to facilitate a change of UID's on files rather
> than having to just chown recursively down the file system. The
> faster I can update the permissions the better basically

Hi Ryan - I'm afraid I don't think there is any lower-level mechanism
to replace permissions, just the normal posix syscalls and
standard tools to invoke them.

You can't convince AD to keep the same numbers?  :)

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>