| To: | "'Dave Chinner'" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38 |
| From: | Sean Noonan <Sean.Noonan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:33:36 -0400 |
| Accept-language: | en-US |
| Acceptlanguage: | en-US |
| Cc: | "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Bligh <Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Trammell Hudson <Trammell.Hudson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20110322232504.GC15270@dastard> |
| References: | <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52E8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110322232504.GC15270@dastard> |
| Thread-index: | Acvo6GrbbjY2664GTWm4EnhznDzbMgAuNEug |
| Thread-topic: | XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38 |
> What is the configuration of the machine you are testing on? I can't > reproduce this on a current 2.6.39-tot tree on a 2p/2GB RAM VM that > has it's blockdev images on a single SATA drive.... The machine we are testing with has 12 cores, 12 hyperthreaded siblings, and 48GB of RAM. The filesystem is backed by a partition on one large hardware RAID. There is a second bug we've run into that I'll report tomorrow. Could you point me to the current tree you are working with? 2.6.39-tot doesn't mean anything to me. Sean |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs: register the inode cache shrinker before quotachecks, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |