| To: | "'Andreas Gruenbacher'" <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH v23 08/22] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl |
| From: | "Frank Filz" <ffilzlnx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:38:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | "'Jeff Layton'" <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Alexander Viro'" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Theodore Ts'o'" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, "'Andreas Dilger'" <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, "'J. Bruce Fields'" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Trond Myklebust'" <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Anna Schumaker'" <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dave Chinner'" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-ext4'" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'XFS Developers'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-fsdevel'" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Linux NFS Mailing List'" <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Linux API'" <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=N09OADffL0p2ne7oigEJuMDpp9IEoY+rm4a8YruXBHO9wSTgYltfFyXrUrHfINIZ; h=Received:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Antivirus-Status:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
| In-reply-to: | <CAHc6FU5oeaCxgZPFeNSHDfSjnVKe9km14R4s5RoBhJXPaL7ymQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1467294433-3222-1-git-send-email-agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> <1467294433-3222-9-git-send-email-agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> <1467728537.3800.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> <014101d1d6df$e059fd20$a10df760$@mindspring.com> <CAHc6FU5oeaCxgZPFeNSHDfSjnVKe9km14R4s5RoBhJXPaL7ymQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQIb+PprzmyLR4FR0RZP9RFOhPhjLgF6rA/3Al6R4X8Cx3dMagLxt4O3nzX2ooA= |
> > Hmm, but does that result in examining the whole ACL for most access > checks, at least for files where most of the accesses are by the owner, or a > member of a specific group (with perhaps a ton of special case users added > on the end)? > > I don't understand -- what does this algorithm have to do with access checks? Oh, sorry, misread the patch... got caught up looking at a tree and not seeing the forest... Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 040/119] xfs: create helpers for mapping, unmapping, and converting file fork extents, Darrick J. Wong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: abstract block export operations from nfsd layouts, J. Bruce Fields |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v23 08/22] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl, Andreas Gruenbacher |
| Next by Thread: | RE:ODI (Open Data Institute), Debra Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |