xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS fs size limit?

To: "xfs-list" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS fs size limit?
From: "Steve Wolfe" <nw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:00:42 -0600
References: <200108021734.f72HYDo07108@jen.americas.sgi.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010802224302.03e82e68@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >I assume you mean software RAID5, right?  I've got a RAID50 array: 2
8-port
> >3ware cards in hw raid5, then those two devices combined software
raid0.  I
> >didn't bother to make the log on a separate device, but I could, if
need be.
>
> That is silly. Just make a big raid0 of it. If for some reason one of
the
> 3ware cards takes a dump you WILL LOSE ALL YOUR DATA.

(snip)

> Which is exactly the reason to avoid the above mentioned configuration.
If
> one card dies you have just lost all your data.

  Personally, I'd bet on a drive or two going out before the controller.
I haven't had any sort of drive controller (IDE/SCSI/RAID) go out in
nearly a decade, but I've had plenty of drives go South on me.

> Which was exactly what happend. They raid
> controller (Ami megaraid) got upset after one disk died and they lost
there
> complete Mysql Database.

   Since this isn't the place, I won't point out the obvious flaws in
their backup/recovery scheme.  My experience with the MegaRAIDs has been
that the cards do work fine, provided that you do everything exactly the
way the card expects - which is sometimes complicated, sometimes
difficult, and usually counter-intuitive. ; )

steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>