| To: | "'Simon Matter'" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Axel Thimm'" <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0 |
| From: | "Kai Leibrandt" <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:26:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <1055.10.1.200.117.1062051046.squirrel@imap01.ch.sauter-bc.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<SNIP> > Well, RH 7.2 is also widely used here and there is quite a > big difference between 7.2 ... 9. On 7.2, rpm is statically > linked. And then, if an application like rpm breaks with a > certain kernel/filesystem, I expect it not to be the only > application that breaks. Am I paranoid? > > Simon That's just what I was thinking; is rpm only an indication that other apps might have issues as well? If so, how do we identify them and rectify the problems? In the kernel, or in the app? Kai. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: EXPANSION PARTITION PROBLEM, Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EXPANSION PARTITION PROBLEM, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0, Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |