stp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Current status?

To: Pekka Pietikainen <Pekka.Pietikainen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Current status?
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:42:59 +0200
Cc: stp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.95a.1001026100837.25390A-100000@lxplus014.cern.ch>; from "Pekka Pietikainen" on 2000-10-26T10:22:30
References: <20001026031402.J8597@marowsky-bree.de> <Pine.LNX.3.95a.1001026100837.25390A-100000@lxplus014.cern.ch>
Sender: owner-stp@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.3i
On 2000-10-26T10:22:30,
   Pekka Pietikainen <Pekka.Pietikainen@xxxxxxx> said:

> > what is the current status of STP for Linux?
> Hi
> 102MB/s with 1MB AceNIC's with jumbo frames using < 5% CPU is what I
> currently get ;)

Sounds great. How does the average latency compare to TCP ?

> > Is STP available from inside the kernel? Does it work with 2.2 or 2.4?
> The current code assumes that the protocol is used from userland 
> (it tries to use map_user_kiobuf for every case). I'm looking at fixing
> that soon, though using nbd as a testcase.

Exactly, nbd (or rather drbd ;), was what I was thinking about using STP for.
It isn't that urgent, but good to see someone is working on it ;-)

Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>
    Development HA

-- 
Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>