| To: | Yanjun HU <huyanjun79@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Can I tansplant Fortran90 frontend for my use? |
| From: | David Stephenson <dlstephe@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:15:57 -0800 |
| Cc: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx, pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | SGI -- Compilers |
| References: | <F125fgZUr3CrJRxKZMq00001012@hotmail.com> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Yanjun HU wrote:
> Now we are developing a project called ParaVT which visualize the
> behavior of a PVM/MPI program. Instrumentation the Fortran source program is
> the key technology of this project. So the fortran frontend of pro64 is
> useful for us.
Feedback instrumentation is performed early in the back end
(just before lowering from VH whirl to H whirl), but not in
the front end. So the whirl code is instrumented, instead
of the fortran. It might be possible to match the data back
to the original fortran code.
- David
--
David Stephenson http://reality.sgi.com/dlstephe_engr/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Software pipelining, Matthew McNaughton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ld: could not read symbols when using -Ofast, Wayne Vieira |
| Previous by Thread: | Can I tansplant Fortran90 frontend for my use?, Yanjun HU |
| Next by Thread: | Software pipelining, raya |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |