| To: | sun.c.chan@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: unoptimized dead store |
| From: | Robert Kennedy <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 13:36:58 -0700 |
| Cc: | jkingdon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stuart@xxxxxxxxx, pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9287DC1579B0D411AA2F009027F44C3F042DFA99@FMSMSX41> (sun.c.chan@intel.com) |
| References: | <9287DC1579B0D411AA2F009027F44C3F042DFA99@FMSMSX41> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Actually xx is uninitialized, so value returned by main could
> be anything.
I'm confused. xx is initialized; it's argc.
-- Robert
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: unoptimized dead store, Chan, Sun C |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: unoptimized dead store, Robert Kennedy |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: unoptimized dead store, Chan, Sun C |
| Next by Thread: | RE: unoptimized dead store, Chan, Sun C |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |