pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: auto-pic or non-auto-pic

To: "Chan, Sun C" <sun.c.chan@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Kratzer, Willi'" <Willi.Kratzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: auto-pic or non-auto-pic
From: Jack Carter <jcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:50:02 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: "Chan, Sun C" <sun.c.chan@intel.com> "RE: auto-pic or non-auto-pic" (Mar 30, 8:58am)
References: <9287DC1579B0D411AA2F009027F44C3F042DF9C4@FMSMSX41>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
I thought the golden age of ia64 ELF ABI was to have only
PIC? The non-shared options were there only to get things
moving until dso's came on the scene.

We have dso support now so why are we still allowing non-shared
objects? If the first assumption I stated is correct then the
longer we tolerate the non-shared objects to proliferate then
the messier things will get in the future because archives
tend to linger around forever.

Jack

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>