| To: | raya <raya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pro64 <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: whirle via RTL |
| From: | "Ross A. Towle" <rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:38:07 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | raya <raya@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> "whirle via RTL" (Jan 25, 9:56am) |
| References: | <3A6FDC3F.F3FBDD2@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
WHIRL and GNU RTL are related only in the sense they are both intermediate representations of programs. After that they are quite different in terms of the semantic information available, levels of abstraction, annotation, ... One could probably generate GNU RTL from WHIRL but not vice versa. -Ross |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dumping .B files, Ken Lesniak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Problems building libstdc++-v3, John Hsu |
| Previous by Thread: | whirle via RTL, raya |
| Next by Thread: | Dumping .B files, Charles R. Hardnett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |