| To: | Stuart McNicholas <sjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Link error with big fortran program |
| From: | jcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jack Carter) |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jun 2000 11:21:19 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-reply-to: | Stuart McNicholas <sjm@tcpc3.bham.ac.uk> "Re: Link error with big fortran program" (Jun 15, 6:59pm) |
| References: | <00061510543005.12601@tcdec3> <10006150919.ZM117796@johmar.engr.sgi.com> <00061518591300.26148@tcdec3> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Stuart, No, you didn't do anything wrong. The undocumented -relax option is an internal workaround for the linker bug you and others have been witnessing. Evidently it didn't make it in the bits be published and we are trying to figure out why not. Jack |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Link error with big fortran program, Michael Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Link error with big fortran program, Stuart McNicholas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Link error with big fortran program, Stuart McNicholas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Link error with big fortran program, Michael Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |