pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: log import needs ability to write mark records?

To: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: log import needs ability to write mark records?
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:18:31 -0500
Cc: "'Mark Goodwin'" <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'pcp'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <00ca01d16ae0$3d9ea240$b8dbe6c0$@internode.on.net> (Ken McDonell's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:38:56 +1100")
References: <56C691E0.4050808@xxxxxxxxxx> <00ca01d16ae0$3d9ea240$b8dbe6c0$@internode.on.net>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
"Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]  Please note this brings up a case where pmlogextract should
> _not_ follow the new multiple-archives semantics ... it _really_
> needs to know where each archive ends [...]

Isn't that exactly what the <mark>'s in an input archive are for?
When pmlogextract is given a multi-archive, it should work the same
way as upon an archive that was itself composed from multiple
generations of pmlogextract (being merged multiple times) outputs.

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>