| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms |
| From: | fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:06:35 -0500 |
| Cc: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1065670774.114691299755917880.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:18:37 +1100 (EST)") |
| References: | <1299711474.28719.16.camel@bozo-laptop> <1065670774.114691299755917880.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [...] > If that indom field is still unused and this is doable, I'd prefer > option 3 to be available, for sure. FWIW, ditto. It would be useful to retain all the generality already available for non-event metrics. - FChE |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, David Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, David Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |