Re: datetime enhancements

[fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)]

kenj wrote:

> [...]
>> Where does the logic come in that additive or subtractive
>> time intevals would need to be relative to the (archive?)
>> start/end times vs. the actual current time?
>
> It has always been so when the context is an archive ... Stan's output
> is from a formative QA test where an archive context is the only thing
> that is deterministic.

Understood.  One can also see a need also to use relative-to-now types
of queries against archives, like "play back stats X from exactly 24
hours ago"; would that be covered by the -O/-S "@TIMESTR" syntax?

- FChE