pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: QA status - warning

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: QA status - warning
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:38:46 -0400
Cc: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <108199651.589658.1368437712881.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Mon, 13 May 2013 05:35:12 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <51823EB3.1030003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51899D55.20202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1964501527.12596632.1367975338274.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <5189E7B2.30501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1154906569.13931543.1368141029088.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51902A5B.9080808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1160902372.350447.1368404259385.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51909DA0.3020402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <108199651.589658.1368437712881.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]
>> Yes ... only started failing in the last week, may be 2 weeks.  Is there any
>> parallel gmake being done in the rpm packaging?
>
> Not explicitly - might be worth reverting the parallel make commit
> (91917ccf3954bb39e495faa4ff5da1090fc6dfec) and seeing if anything
> changes though?

Those makefiles that were written with incomplete dependencies and/or
data races (and thus unsafe with make -j) were easily "fixed" with
.NOTPARALLEL:.  If that is a problem for a particular directory, please
let's try that first rather than reverting the whole thing.

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>