pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp updates: qa, lukas merge, atop prep work

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp updates: qa, lukas merge, atop prep work
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 09:22:37 -0400
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <193475419.4772274.1432522251478.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Sun, 24 May 2015 22:50:51 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <193475419.4772274.1432522251478.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]
> commit 2a32ca8b4f055776597c23f54931d0da25b2eecb
> Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri May 22 16:51:21 2015 +1000
>
>     build: add struct declarations for application headers
>     
>     Add struct names for all structures, as is done in a couple of places
>     in pmapi.h and throughout impl.h.  This is useful to applications that
>     don't want to include pmapi.h and instead forward-declare structs that
>     they use.  

Why would an application using pmapi not want to #include <pmapi.h>?


>     The atop upstream code has headers using this model, which we'll
>     want to integrate with shortly.

It would be good to hear details about your plans for integrating (with?) atop.


- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>