pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pmdapapi buglets from Coverity scan

To: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pmdapapi buglets from Coverity scan
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:00:32 -0500
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87mw41s46o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> (Lukas Berk's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:10:55 -0500")
References: <1730959537.2690842.1423612674835.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <8761atz99h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mtwyaer3q.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <87mw41s46o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]  I would also like to remove the phrasing that warnings are
> reasonable in the testsuite, imo in this case, they aren't. [...]

(By the way, in case the existence of warnings during pmda install
seems somehow offensive on principle, please be aware that many other
pmdas produce them, and this is OK.)

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>