| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Secure sockets builds have high daemon memory utilisation |
| From: | fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:35:59 -0400 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1933771917.25933236.1402710839591.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:53:59 -0400 (EDT)") |
| References: | <1896810420.23212457.1402370819966.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5397573A.90102@xxxxxxxxxx> <1919582989.23966133.1402473837122.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <18804700.25421398.1402627700096.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <539B5DDA.7050407@xxxxxxxxxx> <1933771917.25933236.1402710839591.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
nathans wrote: > [...] Memory footprint is also a metric people will use when > considering PCP, and/or comparing to other similar tools. Which similar tools shall we use for competitive analysis purposes? - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: mgoodwin merge, qa, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp+graphite, take 2, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Secure sockets builds have high daemon memory utilisation, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Secure sockets builds have high daemon memory utilisation, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |