pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug/Issue tracker

To: Michele Baldessari <michele@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug/Issue tracker
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:02:01 -0400
Cc: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150420184937.GJ18943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Michele Baldessari's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:49:37 +0200")
References: <20150420174712.GH18943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87twwad4sf.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150420184937.GJ18943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
michele wrote:

> [...]  I can investigate that avenue as well, but I definitely
> prefer that we use a single DB for issues. We cannot sensibly ask
> users to look for open issues in multiple DB's. [...]

We don't have to ask them to do so - it is at most a courtesy.  We'd
like to make it easy for people to report problems.  It is our
responsibility to triage / duplicate-eliminate if -we- can handle
three separate bugtrackers, then the status quo is IMHO ok.

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>