| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git |
| From: | fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:28:58 -0400 |
| Cc: | pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1299818254.1662151.1342398276792.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:24:36 +1000 (EST)") |
| References: | <20120713210843.GC14467@xxxxxxxxxx> <1299818254.1662151.1342398276792.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi, Nathan - > [...] Looks like you started on cleaning up some unused PCP_X11_* > macros - there are several more of those toward the end of > builddefs.in that can also go [...] Gone now. > [...] Hmm - there still seems to be a pcp_configure target in the > top level makefile allowing this? - we probably should remove that > (sounds like the intention). Gone now. > The debian/rules file will need an update, cos it uses that... but I > can do that once I know that pcp_configure is intended to go (or > should that instead now become "configure --prefix=/usr" to make > life simpler for distributors?). [...] I tweaked with how I imagine you might want it to work. (I don't yet have a debian VM to test it on.) > [...] We'll need to get the big platform builds (deb/rpm/mac, maybe > Solaris if Ken/Max get a chance) sorted out before then I think > ... seems feasible though. Sounds good. - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |