pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fche/prefix branch on pcpfans.git
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:28:58 -0400
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1299818254.1662151.1342398276792.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:24:36 +1000 (EST)")
References: <20120713210843.GC14467@xxxxxxxxxx> <1299818254.1662151.1342398276792.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Hi, Nathan -

> [...]  Looks like you started on cleaning up some unused PCP_X11_*
> macros - there are several more of those toward the end of
> builddefs.in that can also go [...]

Gone now.

> [...]  Hmm - there still seems to be a pcp_configure target in the
> top level makefile allowing this? - we probably should remove that
> (sounds like the intention).  

Gone now.

> The debian/rules file will need an update, cos it uses that... but I
> can do that once I know that pcp_configure is intended to go (or
> should that instead now become "configure --prefix=/usr" to make
> life simpler for distributors?). [...]

I tweaked with how I imagine you might want it to work.  (I don't yet
have a debian VM to test it on.)


> [...]  We'll need to get the big platform builds (deb/rpm/mac, maybe
> Solaris if Ken/Max get a chance) sorted out before then I think
> ... seems feasible though.

Sounds good.


- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>