pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Debian/Ubuntu packages missing mysql and postgres PMDA (#73)

To: performancecopilot/pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Debian/Ubuntu packages missing mysql and postgres PMDA (#73)
From: Nathan Scott <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:30:21 -0800
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1456277421; bh=wqtyLDZ6vkERRyjAqP+AEZVryfLP6mUSj+EhTErcu7A=; h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Qom+6VVrDx01qDB5KeFBLrQ22Vg+Eb5N5jRpwt81nbXKWMjbljRw+NT3Jcq1k7bub WJabtB6yP2EQTgltD3aBwz3hMyW4JXIqKwVKxk6JISyhRmqORstsYbt+ca7EG3ydtc F+n5pXf9hKG2R43p7Ta5kdWRjrJgTLieeEJ6OpvU=
In-reply-to: <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/73@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp
List-id: performancecopilot/pcp <pcp.performancecopilot.github.com>
List-post: <mailto:reply+00bd08b6b96ee83316d87e301ec567544d6f3a2df257d09f92cf0000000112e4c9ad92a169ce080d9f10@reply.github.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:unsub+00bd08b6b96ee83316d87e301ec567544d6f3a2df257d09f92cf0000000112e4c9ad92a169ce080d9f10@reply.github.com>, <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AL0ItqGbCk2fhO8dxUramPeAoqmv-Hiyks5pnP8tgaJpZM4HetMq>
References: <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/73@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: performancecopilot/pcp <reply+00bd08b6b96ee83316d87e301ec567544d6f3a2df257d09f92cf0000000112e4c9ad92a169ce080d9f10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

@kmcdonell thanks for that list - I've added it to debian/control and checked a build, looks good.

Yep, I would like for us to work on improving the bintray release builds and QA integration. I think what happened here was that even though we're both using qa/admin/check-vm, there's a disconnect between initial VM setup (for bintray builds in this case) and then changes that come along in the interim, like the configure.ac changes adding deps on DBI/DBD and so on (which were reflected in check-vm sometime later).

Perhaps we could set aside some time in the QA-week for this release to explore this some more? I think the work @minnus and @ryandoyle started awhile ago for doing QA in Vagrant VMs (see the Vagrantfile in $TOPDIR and details over at https://www.vagrantup.com) will keep us all on the same page. Then anyone will be able to do both reproducible QA and reproducible releasable builds.

It'll also help, I hope, with the situations where you see QA failures on a local VM that I later cannot reproduce here - like qa/878, argh - we'd both be using the exact same VMs ($TOPDIR/Vagrantfile sets this up and we all use the same configuration, for all the platforms). It could also help get the buildbot setups @lberk manages, and scripts like pcp-qa-summary all able to interoperate on the same VMs.

Sounds like the holy grail for QA and release builds doesn't it? :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>