pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP Licensing Scheme Problem? (#44)

To: performancecopilot/pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP Licensing Scheme Problem? (#44)
From: Nathan Scott <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:14:57 -0700
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1441671297; bh=wq69zd/X5zWcBYYz/Z21XPQ72gsrYYqZyvMtlaAVgoo=; h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qmKi6DKPBl28773Q+0G2l9pMCm4Sxuh/7ZlY28tDSAOXPZd2UcC/cT5Fdt6htXB3M i56mLbhG0rqTRYMfiuUHmeNfWPDUIG90ANcrk+SnMvvRM1rzus5mO/kAeSvXZSe7iJ FTd8a818mgh7vvjYvolm1bCjYflzZFp+666QDtK4=
In-reply-to: <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/44@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp
List-id: performancecopilot/pcp <pcp.performancecopilot.github.com>
List-post: <mailto:reply+00bd08b6871371f9fbdc4078e9ab083101cf74df77aedfd292cf000000011205ea8092a169ce0623d575@reply.github.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:unsub+00bd08b6871371f9fbdc4078e9ab083101cf74df77aedfd292cf000000011205ea8092a169ce0623d575@reply.github.com>, <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AL0ItsIWyLQdSg8V2svZ9g5XCkqtt_aDks5oviAAgaJpZM4FxtYZ>
References: <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/44@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: performancecopilot/pcp <reply+00bd08b6871371f9fbdc4078e9ab083101cf74df77aedfd292cf000000011205ea8092a169ce0623d575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Ed,

2 and 3 should both be LGPL, but 1 is correct as-is (libpcp_pmcd is not an exported library with any kind of API, its just used to share some code between pmcd, pmdapmcd and soon pmdaroot).

Don't worry about opening a new issue, I'll commit those other updates with a reference to this issue.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>