Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selectiv

To:	performancecopilot/pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113)
From:	Nathan Scott <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:27:00 -0700
Delivered-to:	pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=1v2z+0W2qlfToBchQk//ZBM+qV0=; b=u37fkzwRLo3/UGYt O+BrBnqAYU/+EN5t3ji1O8Z9f2m/Xe3hxtAIu73D8iL0F78/hPveYnyqTxVJb2ei cV0JYZK5FbMeE2994kEx9+mPAbb8kFF1gfKH/ms3KvUu9YJZMcFG10RZw4HhkUhF rshod7lHJ0XLc+F3DodhEMscy9k=
In-reply-to:	<performancecopilot/pcp/issues/113@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive:	https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp
List-id:	performancecopilot/pcp <pcp.performancecopilot.github.com>
List-post:	<mailto:reply+00bd08b6917be3236d00b9baddfc17f51f5fdd1e9433679e92cf0000000113f19ec492a169ce0a8d1c06@reply.github.com>
List-unsubscribe:	<mailto:unsub+00bd08b6917be3236d00b9baddfc17f51f5fdd1e9433679e92cf0000000113f19ec492a169ce0a8d1c06@reply.github.com>, <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AL0ItuCv5GO1nI930evwppc6_nLgpxyTks5qqILEgaJpZM4J9PQM>
References:	<performancecopilot/pcp/issues/113@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	performancecopilot/pcp <reply+00bd08b6917be3236d00b9baddfc17f51f5fdd1e9433679e92cf0000000113f19ec492a169ce0a8d1c06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

As discussed on IRC, these are possibly candidates for pmdamounts(1) monitoring. The pmdalinux code attempts to only export local, non-memory filesystem stats via filesys.* FWIW (as you found).

A specialized pmdaceph would be the best bet for exporting ceph statfs data, I suspect, e.g.
https://github.com/badone/pcp-pmda-ceph ... I'll send Brad a note about it.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Zack Cerza Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Nathan Scott Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Nathan Scott <= Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Frank Ch. Eigler Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Brad Hubbard Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Nathan Scott

Previous by Date:	Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Nathan Scott
Next by Date:	Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Frank Ch. Eigler
Previous by Thread:	Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:	Re: [performancecopilot/pcp] filesys metrics are (probably) too selective (#113), Frank Ch. Eigler
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]