| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Bug 974] Installation issues when user "pcp" and/or group "pcp" already defined |
| From: | bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 13 May 2013 13:46:17 +0000 |
| Auto-submitted: | auto-generated |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bug-974-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
| References: | <bug-974-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
Frank Ch. Eigler
changed
bug 974
Comment # 5
on bug 974
from Frank Ch. Eigler
(In reply to comment #0) > And finally, we need some (new) way to allow a local administrator to > over-ride the setting for $PCP_USER and $PCP_GROUP both at package > installation time and at run-time. At package installation time, for RPM, the user/group names need to be fixed, as ownership checks / predictability require. For the autoconf-processed rpm.spec.in, the existing --with-user-account=FOO option could be propagated into the spec file; just need a --with-group-account=BAR to go with it. Like a mouse and a cookie. You are receiving this mail because:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: QA status - warning, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | IPv6 For libpcp_pmda, Dave Brolley |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 974] Installation issues when user "pcp" and/or group "pcp" already defined, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 942] Wish List / Backlog / RFEs, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |