pcp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Bug 948] PMDAs should not be shipped without some QA coverage

from [bugzilla-daemon] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Bug 948] PMDAs should not be shipped without some QA coverage
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 02:16:03 +0000
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <bug-948-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-948-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/>
Bug 948 depends on bug 961, which changed state.
What Removed Added
Status NEW RESOLVED
Resolution --- FIXED

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are on the CC list for the bug.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Bug 948] PMDAs should not be shipped without some QA coverage, bugzilla-daemon <=
Previous by Date:  [Bug 961] Mising QA for memcache PMDA, bugzilla-daemon
Next by Date:  [Bug 1102] security bug (information disclosure) in linux-proc pmda - case 2: old kernel, bugzilla-daemon
Previous by Thread:  [Bug 961] Mising QA for memcache PMDA, bugzilla-daemon
Next by Thread:  [Bug 1102] security bug (information disclosure) in linux-proc pmda - case 2: old kernel, bugzilla-daemon
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]