[Bug 948] New: PMDAs should not be shipped without some QA coverage

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Bug ID	948
Summary	PMDAs should not be shipped without some QA coverage
Product	pcp
Version	unspecified
Hardware	All
OS	Linux
Status	NEW
Severity	major
Priority	P5
Component	pcp
Assignee	mort@sgi.com
Reporter	kenj@internode.on.net
CC	pcp@oss.sgi.com
Classification	Unclassified

This a "master" bug to cover a raft of PMDAs that are currently shipped but
with no coverage at all in the PCP QA suite.

As a matter of principle, _every_ PMDA should have some QA coverage.

If the PMDA has special co-dependencies (e.g. special hardware, unusual kernel
module, concurrent DBMS installation, ...) then it should _still_ have coverage
in the PCP QA suite, using the existing "not run" infrastructure to avoid
running the associated tests if the co-dependencies are not satisisfied ...
this means there is a chance that someone will run the tests somewhere, even if
it is outside the common QA processes.

---

      You are receiving this mail because:

• You are on the CC list for the bug.