https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296750
--- Comment #4 from Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I'm suspect this is NOT a regression in interp.c (there is already a bunch of
QA tests for interpolation across <mark> records, so that's sort of what I'd
have expected).
But it is a problem associated with the use of the -O2sec time window on this
archive ...
In my archive the <mark> is at 07:13:21.705
pmrep gets the WRONG answers with -O2sec
$ pmrep -O2s -t 10s -pf%H:%M:%S -a third sample.byte_ctr
s.byte_ctr
byte/s
07:13:19 N/A
07:13:29 -48.900 <--- sample after <mark>
07:13:39 494.100
07:13:49 488.700
and pmrep gets the RIGHT answers without -O
$ pmrep -t 10s -pf%H:%M:%S -a third sample.byte_ctr
s.byte_ctr
byte/s
07:13:17 N/A
07:13:27 N/A <--- sample after <mark>
07:13:37 457.400
07:13:47 550.500
I'll post as I discover more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=etYb9Osh18&a=cc_unsubscribe
|