pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#805955: [pcp] Bug#805955: pcp: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpacka

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bug#805955: [pcp] Bug#805955: pcp: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (no binary artifacts)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:44:16 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: 805955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <363843620.6970954.1468912367736.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1bNooB-0001FN-27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <363843620.6970954.1468912367736.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Santiago Vila <sanvila@xxxxxxx>, 805955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: PCP Development Team <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:48:02 +0000
Resent-from: Santiago Vila <sanvila@xxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.805955.B805955.146891787114891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
> Actually some advice would be great, having had an initial look into
> this one now.  Patch below shows the basic split we'll need to make
> the architecture independent packages generated separately, but I'm
> not sure how to fit that split into the rest of the rules file (I get
> the same sort of errors with a change like this in place no matter
> what I try - maybe its obvious to someone more deb knowledgeable?).

I have not tested the patch but I see why it would not work.

Try putting "dh_builddeb" somewhere in binary-indep, otherwise the
actual .deb packages will not be created.

Thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>