| To: | Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] installing pcp requires `which` |
| From: | Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:39:24 +1100 |
| Cc: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080312012133.e0e93895.pj@sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.SGI.4.58.0803121351200.93987974@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <55812.192.168.3.1.1205300930.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <20080312012133.e0e93895.pj@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Does pcp.spec.in only use 'which' in the lines:
>
> if which chkconfig
> then
> chkconfig --add pcp
No. There are already funcs for getting round a lack of chkconfig
in rc-proc.sh, which also get called from other places
(like init scripts)
Dr.Michael("Kimba")Newton kimbrr@xxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] installing pcp requires `which`, Paul Jackson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] installing pcp requires `which`, Paul Jackson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] installing pcp requires `which`, Paul Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] installing pcp requires `which`, Paul Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |