pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 01/12] Fix Windows PMDA build

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Fix Windows PMDA build
From: Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:58:31 +1100
Cc: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1165383346.1281.123.camel@edge>
References: <1163999314.4695.231.camel@edge> <1164321131.4695.368.camel@edge> <Pine.SGI.4.58.0612061551470.53803701@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <1165381359.1281.113.camel@edge> <1165383346.1281.123.camel@edge>
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Nathan Scott wrote:
> OK, I discussed this with Ken, and we agreed that the patch I sent
> over earlier is what we should go with.  The main issue here is to
> do with getting new versions of src/pmdas/windows/*.save into the
> distributed PCP tarballs, and we decided to put it back how it was
> originally, and send those files to you separately (on the rare
> occassions that they need to be re-generated).

are u sure u really mean the same patch u sent? or do u just mean, leave
it as was in the 1st place? the patch was to delete ".uu" from
pmda/windows/GNUmakefile right?
When i do that, from a clean build i get

gmake[5]: *** No rule to make target `show-all-ctrs.save', needed by
`src-pcp'.
 Stop.
gmake[4]: *** [src-pcp] Error 2
gmake[3]: *** [src-pcp] Error 2
gmake[2]: *** [src-pcp] Error 2
make[1]: *** [pcp.src] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kimbrr/isms/mangrove/mgmt/pcp/build'
make: *** [pcp-open-2.7.0] Error 2

 > I did notice one unrelated issue when doing a test build just now,
> however - you'll need this (incremental) patch to get a source tar
> ball which can build itself, otherwise theres a missing config file
> and the build goes belly up in the build-src-tarball phase (only in
> the case of a build from the source generated from the source, if
> you see what I mean - not the normal case of building in a patched
> workarea - a quirk of the Makefile's LSRCFILES macro use).

this is an increment to the other stomp patch, right? just want to sure as
i think i'll put this stuff ona separate PV, as its a larger homogenous
change

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>